Research on the most effective and cost-effective methods of physiotherapy training for improving chronic lower back pain outcomes can use a multitude of different designs. During the course of my search for evidence, I expect to find several meta-analyses of the literature as well as a variety of qualitative and quantitative designs. Because I am exploring treatment/intervention efficacy as well as cost-effectiveness, designs will range from experimental and quasi-experimental to cohort and case study designs. A meta-analysis of the literature on interventions would help to illuminate specific issues like the cost effectiveness of target interventions, as well as measurable patient outcomes. The meta-analyses will be systematic, taking into account published studies using a range of different variables. However, ultimately a cohort design would be optimal for gathering initial data. Cohort designs are likely to be ubiquitous in the literature on the treatment efficacy of specific physiological interventions for lower back pain. As Song & Chung (2011) point out, cohort designs are frequently used in medical research because “a well-designed cohort study can provide powerful results,” (p. 2235). The methods used generally entail studying a disease-free population sample (in this case, a sample without back pain) over time, to determine the effectiveness of the intervention...
This way, the same population can be evaluated to determine treatment efficacy. Unfortunately, the cohort design will be less effective at addressing the financial outcomes of the target interventions.References
Song, J.W. & Chung, K.C. (2011). Observational studies. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeries 126(6): 2234-2242.
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now